E-NEWSLETTER

Higher Ed Dialog

New EducationDynamics Webinar -- Now What? Political Implications of the New Administration on Higher Education

Many higher education administrators have asked me in recent weeks how the new Administration, coupled with new appointments to the U.S. Department of Education, is impacting higher education. It is expected that President Barack Obama’s Access and Completion Incentive Fund will exacerbate a significant shift in student demographics, and place increased accountability on colleges and universities to allocate budget dollars wisely to retain more students through graduation.

 

The question then becomes: How can institutions leverage the current political environment to their benefit?

 

To this end, we have devised a complimentary Webinar, titled Now What? Political Implications of the New Administration on Higher Education, to address the opportunities and challenges posed by the new Administration, and have secured two preeminent educational authorities who have been instrumental in shaping higher education: William Hansen, former Deputy Secretary of Education at the U.S. Department of Education, and Scott Fleming, former Senior Education Policy Advisor. Each hold unique perspectives that will give post-secondary administrators unprecedented insight into what the future holds for higher education.

 

To be held on Monday, June 8th from 12:30 to 1:30 p.m. EDT, registration for this complimentary webinar is now available at http://www.educationdynamics.com/media/pulse/administration-webinar/. Space is limited so secure your spot now.

 

I encourage you to submit your comments or questions pertaining to the webinar topic. Specifically, what do you feel are the immediate or long-term implications that could result from the changes occurring on Capitol Hill? Your responses will help drive Webinar content and future blog posts!

 

-Steven R. Isaac

Only published comments... May 26 2009, 04:37 PM by Matthew Ulmer
Filed under:

Comments

 

Christopher J. said:

My fear isi that there will be no long=term implicatons.  That education will be all the focus now, until things get back on track, adn then it'll be forgotten again, like always. Relegated to some corner while the latest big problem is faced, with people still failign to realize that there is no bigger problem than the education of our country.

May 27, 2009 10:28 AM
 

Mary Smith said:

Christopher, I'm not entirely sure if I share your concern, and I'd like to explain why.

Many of the issues the new administration is looking to tackle all stem from education, and they seem to recognize that.  They want to create more jobs, they want to fill more jobs, they want to make America compete on a world platform again, they want to start manufacturing more products again.  All of this points to one need: Better education.  In our middle and high schools, and in our colleges.  If the administration wants to actually solve these problems, they're going to have to keep a consistent focus on education.  It can't be pushed aside, or the problems can't be fixed.

For the first time in a long time, I'm actually optimistic about our changes.  

May 29, 2009 11:53 AM
 

Jennifer H. said:

How do we access the funds? I have tried looking for information related to exactly how much will be set aside for higher ed vs k-12 and how much of that will be for retention and student success initiatives. Does anyone have any links that can help me?

May 29, 2009 12:00 PM
 

R. Contreras said:

I may be alone on this one, but I am not entirely sold on the idea of 100% Direct Lending. When it comes to lenders, students have always had a choice of lenders. In fact, not to long ago there was a controversy about the preferred lender lists many schools would present prospective students; controversy being that students were not given a “real” choice, but only whatever was beneficial for us “evil” financial aid administrators. While it is true that many aspects of the private lending industry have gone array, it now seems that the federal government has done exactly what schools were told they could not do, e.g., tell student they have no choice of lenders. How is 100% DL an improvement on this?    

My other concern is the Perkins. I personally have not worked much with Perkins, but my short experience has not been all that pleasant. Most people I know are divided; there are those who don’t like it, and those who flat out hate it. What’s in store for the Perkins program? What changes can we expect?

June 4, 2009 7:44 PM
 

M. Lopez said:

What changes can we expect that specifically support the increase in enrollment and retention of underrepresented students?

June 5, 2009 11:01 AM

Leave a Comment

(required)  
(optional)
(required)  
Add

© Copyright 2007 - EducationDynamics, LLC
Home | Media | Privacy Policy | Contact